Live demo
A real match, start to finish
The matcher run on our own paper, unedited.
The paper
Scaling the Scholar: Distributed Multi-Agent System for Automated Peer Review
We present a multi-agent system for automated peer review of academic papers. Specialist agents score a submission along separate dimensions of review quality, and an orchestrator synthesises their results into a venue-specific accept or reject recommendation using guidelines loaded per venue rather than thresholds fixed in code. The architecture is event-driven, built on a message broker with event sourcing and a read-side projection, and the agents share a common tool server for retrieval against live literature. We evaluate against the published decisions of three machine learning venues spanning eight years, and additionally ablate an iterative deliberation variant in which the reviewer re-invokes sub-agents through function calling.
Placed in
Expert finding and Q&A systems
Information Systems · Computer Science
Our read
written by the modelJournal of the Association for Information Science and Technology
With a 42% topic fit and a 90th percentile reach in the area, this venue provides the strongest balance of relevance and visibility for a system-focused peer review study. Its h-index of 101 and citation rate of 3.3 demonstrate significant impact within information science research.
Worth stretching for
Information Processing & Management
While the topic fit is lower at 29%, its 96th percentile reach and high citation rate of 6.6 offer substantial potential for visibility if the contribution is framed through an information management lens.
Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Human Computation and Crowdsourcing, Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, and International Journal of Crowd Science do not provide information regarding publication charges.
The model chose from the ranked list below and cannot add a venue to it.
What to look at
- Topic fit.
- Whether they publish this kind of work at all.
- Reach.
- A percentile against the other venues listed here.
- Charge.
- What you pay to publish open access. "Not published" means OpenAlex has no figure, which is not the same as free.
- Citation rate.
- OpenAlex's two year average. "Not published" for most conferences, whose records it has not extended past 2021, so a blank is a gap in the source rather than a venue nobody cites.
- A warning.
- The venue's own numbers do not hold together.
Two venues a few percentiles apart on reach can be ten times apart on what they charge. Conference figures are the ones OpenAlex has attributed to the standing venue, which for most conferences means work up to 2021 rather than everything they have published since.
Wiley
Reach
90th
Citation rate
3.3
h-index
101
Papers
2317
Charge
$3,000
Springer Science+Business Media
Reach
85th
Citation rate
1.3
h-index
80
Papers
696
Charge
$3,290
Elsevier BV
Reach
96th
Citation rate
6.6
h-index
190
Papers
7162
Charge
$3,020
Reach
86th
Citation rate
3.7
h-index
38
Papers
408
Charge
not published
Emerald Publishing Limited
Reach
83th
Citation rate
6.9
h-index
23
Papers
223
Charge
not published
Association for Computing Machinery
Reach
83th
Citation rate
1.2
h-index
71
Papers
1482
Charge
not published
Chinese Academy of Sciences
Reach
80th
Citation rate
2.9
h-index
25
Papers
410
Charge
not published
Reach
89th
Citation rate
2.3
h-index
130
Papers
2232
Charge
not published
Springer Nature (Netherlands)
Reach
95th
Citation rate
4.2
h-index
197
Papers
8466
Charge
$2,890
Morgan & Claypool Publishers
Reach
75th
Citation rate
0.9
h-index
37
Papers
865
Charge
not published
Reach is a percentile within this research area, and citation rate is OpenAlex's two-year mean citedness, which is not the Impact Factor.
Free, no account, and we keep no copy of your text.