Built for researchers
The read you need before you submit.
An accept or reject on your draft, before a human reviewer gives you one.
What it does
Judge
A venue-aware accept or reject on your draft.
Explore
Prior art, your angle, and the gaps still open.
Benchmarked
Scored against the real decisions on 697 papers.
Live sources
Current literature, searched while the review runs.
Venue guidelines
Each verdict applies the venue's own criteria.
Gap Alerts
An email when new papers land in a topic you watch.
How a review runs
Upload a PDF, pick a venue, get back one call against that venue's criteria.
Not only machine learning
Alongside ICLR, NeurIPS and ACL sit eLife, PLOS Medicine, Physical Review Letters and the American Economic Review. Each is read against its own published criteria rather than a single bar we invented: eLife's assessment, for one, rates how important the findings are separately from how strong the evidence is, and the report comes back in those terms.
See it run
These are real runs, not screenshots. Open one and judge the output before you spend anything.